Leak Sight AI Pilot

Start with a bounded facility problem.

A Leak Sight AI pilot focuses on 10–30 exposed, high-risk locations over approximately three months, with operators involved in every review cycle.

Request a PilotReview the Program
3Months
10–30
High-risk locations
2
Supported camera types
1
Agreed review workflow

Program Structure

Enough scope to learn, small enough to govern.

The first deployment is designed to test camera fit, evidence quality, false-signal handling, operator usefulness, and maintenance handoff without making unsupported claims from a broad rollout.

  • 10 to 30 selected high-risk monitoring locations
  • Approximately three months of supported operation
  • One supported RGB and one supported thermal camera type
  • Calibration for the selected facility and monitored zones
  • Alert review sessions and structured operator feedback
  • Maintenance-ticket export in an agreed format
Dense array of metal tubes inside an industrial steam condenserBounded Equipment Scope

A pilot begins with supported equipment and observable failure modes.

Complex heat-transfer equipment reinforces why camera placement, thermal baselines, and asset-specific calibration are defined before monitoring starts.

Photo: Alex Liivet · CC0

Pilot Sequence

Four phases keep the evaluation traceable.

Timing varies with installation access, facility schedules, and event availability. The program is approximately three months, not a guarantee of a fixed calendar duration.

  1. 01

    Scope

    Select exposed assets, define current inspection baselines, and agree success measures.

  2. 02

    Install & calibrate

    Confirm camera views, monitored zones, operating context, retention, and access.

  3. 03

    Review

    Assess alerts with operators, label false signals, and adjust facility-specific settings.

  4. 04

    Evaluate

    Compare the pilot against the agreed measures and document deployment constraints.

Success Measures

Measure against the site baseline, not an invented target.

The pilot records current practice first, then evaluates whether the system produces useful, timely evidence under the selected conditions.

  • Leak detection rate
  • False alarms per camera per week
  • Time from onset to detection
  • Manual inspection hours reduced
  • Estimated material or water loss avoided
  • Alerts operators considered useful
  • Time required to deploy a new camera

Facility Fit

A strong pilot has observable assets and an engaged review team.

Useful starting conditions

  • Exposed water or steam assets with known inspection concerns
  • Practical RGB and thermal camera positions
  • Operators available to confirm, dismiss, and annotate events
  • A baseline inspection or escalation process to compare

Needs a different approach

  • Buried assets with no useful visual signature
  • Invisible gas detection without appropriate non-visual sensors
  • Autonomous shutdown or safety-control requirements
  • Unrestricted collection of confidential process video

Pilot Qualification

Bring one facility and a measurable inspection problem.

The request form collects enough context to assess asset visibility, camera fit, operator availability, and a responsible pilot scope.

Request a Pilot